By Casey Peters
Happy Darwin Day to everyone!! It’s Darwin’s birthday, so I thought I would commemorate the occasion with a blog post.
I have recently read two wonderful books about Darwin’s intellectual predecessors and the development of the ideas the prepared the ground in which Darwin’s great idea could take root and grow. They are Darwin’s Ghosts by Rebecca Stott and Darwin’s Century by Loren Eiseley. I highly recommend both. They are beautifully written and offer a deep appreciation for how important the complex mixture of culture, philosophy, science, and history is for understanding how people think and develop new ways of understanding the world that they experience. Both books provide a deeply satisfying context in which to place Darwin and his achievements, while also celebrating the contributions of many other brilliant and courageous people.
In Darwin’s time, species change by natural selection was in the air. The concept of geological timescales, the recognition of the reality of species extinction, the observation of global patterns of diversity, the careful description of natural variation within species, advances comparative anatomy, systematics, and embryology - all of these and more made the eventual theory of natural selection inevitable. If Darwin hadn’t thought of it, others would have done so independently. In fact several people did – famously including Alfred Russell Wallace, and less famously Patrick Matthew.
Darwin’s great genius was how thoroughly and compellingly he presented his argument, and how deeply he saw its implications. Natural selection is a fairly simple concept, but it explains so many different aspects of the natural world. It is astonishing how completely Darwin showed how evolution by natural selection can account for not just the diversity of life, but also biogeographical patterns, comparative anatomy, behavior and instinct, the apparent design of organisms to fit their environments, and so much more. He also plainly and honestly identified gaps in knowledge where serious contradictions to his theory might lie, effectively laying the way for future research.
When I read On the Origins of Species (just a few years ago*) I was shocked by how modern it seems. I was also surprised by how much ecology it contains. Ecology as a discipline did not have a name until 1866 (7 years after the first edition On the Origin of Species) and didn’t really become an experimental or predictive science (something it is still struggling to do well) until the mid-1900s, but Darwin describes many ideas central to modern ecology. He writes beautifully about the interaction of species with their environment and with each other. He writes about distribution and dispersal, population dynamics, and the concept of the niche. He makes comparison between different ecosystems regarding the strength of natural selection in those environments and the consequences of those differences on observable patterns of diversity. One of the most famous sentences in all of The Origin of Species is a beautiful description of ecological interactions and their evolutionary causes and consequences:
It is interesting to contemplate a tangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent upon each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.
This reminds me of G. Evelyn Hutchison’s description of evolution as a play that takes place on the ecological stage. It adds drama and depth to our experience of the natural world, and it encourages me to get outside to experience, appreciate, and participate in the product of that drama.
Thank you Charles Darwin, thank you those who came before him, and thank you to those who followed and continue to follow in his footsteps.
*I’m actually surprised that I earned a degree in biology without having to read On the Origin of Species. I would guess that many professional biologists haven’t read it, which is a shame. It is a truly amazing work that deserve to be read today.
As primary season is underway, let's talk politics. Mr. Trump is revealing much about himself on a nearly daily basis. Given his views and solidifying role as a contender, we feel that he is worthy of attention. Apparently, espousing "Trump don't care" (see honey badger don't care, and note the similarities) in a recent interview, that Donald Trump doesn't have temper tantrums. Truly. (This was in response to Cruz accusing him of a "Trumper tantrum" over Iowa). Wow.
OK, New Hampshire you are next, so listen up. Trump says that this country needs the kind of thinking that Trump has brought to business (perhaps meaning that the US should file for chapter 11 bankruptcy in order to reduce debt). Donald Trump is keen on building a wall between us and Mexico. Is this Trump's aversion to people who aren't like him, or Trump in his comfort zone: commercial property ventures?
For details, we refer you to a post from October on the Wall of America.
In "Wall of America", I argued that the Wall of America would be built by Mexico, in Mexico, a tourist attraction, a huge commercial success, and an immigration constrain failure. I also argued that the logical follow up on completing a M/Wall of America with Mexico, is one with Canada (let's call it a "Friendship Wall"). I mean who doesn't like a good wall or shopping mall?
New Hampshire - you share a remarkably brief border with Canada. You need to lead on the issue so that our "Friendship Wall" (with Canada) can start with you. Read up. The time to act is now!
And, if you think that I am full of crap, I can assure you, that you are correct. But still, I would love to hear it from you directly (well, indirectly through commenting on the blog).
It might be science, it might be nons(ci)ense, but it still smells.